Saturday, May 2, 2015

Collectivism on the Filipino Dining Table



          Rice. Tilapia. Vegetables. Adobo. Inay. Itay. Ate. Kuya. Bunso. Your typical Filipino setting in the dining area can never be complete if one of them isn’t present. Oh, and of course, plenty of drinking water to quench the thirst and stress after answering your parents’ routinely question of, “Kamusta ang pag-aaral mo, anak?
          The Philippines, a collectivistic country, shares a tradition with its fellow Asian and Hispanic countries: converting the dining table into a conference room. Ever wondered why eating takes so long even when the food isn’t that plenty?
Eating silently is awkward on most situations. The sound of the metal utensils clanking onto ceramic plates becomes deafening. To break this deafening silence, there will always be something to suppress the noise—via turning on the TV or kwentuhan. Sometimes, it’s both.
Another reason behind this is because everyone just wants to catch up with everyone. After a tiring weekday, inay asks how your school was, and then she asks itay something about his work. Itay asks ate if she finally has a boyfriend, and then asks kuya if he passed his exams. Bunso says something irrelevant.
          The cycle goes on a daily basis and it continues on as you create your own family.

          The ceremony all starts with inay calling (read: shouting) from the dining area, saying that dinner is ready. Everyone goes there after the second or third call, following the smell of the food. Whatever the viand is—may it be canned goods or mom’s specialty—everyone, nevertheless, gathers like it was the Last Supper. No one starts to eat unless everyone in the house is in the dining area. It is disrespectful to eat ahead.
          After one-fourth of each individual’s meal has been consumed, the talking starts. The news, weather, school, love, work, money, goals and ambitions in life—mostly anything under the sun is open to discussion on the dining table, although it is an unspoken rule to never talk about family problems while eating as it ruins everybody’s appetite.
          The discussion can last from 20 minutes to an hour or so, depending on the topic. Everyone could be done eating and would still continue to talk until they have some business to do. Drinking a glass of water ends the ceremony and it concludes the meeting.

          This kind of tradition is prevalent in most collectivistic societies as depicted by media. Collectivism is implicitly expressed by this practice as we try to connect ourselves to the other and to openly bond ourselves as a whole group. Individualistic societies also exhibit this, but let us keep in mind that the two extremes act as a spectrum and all societies are dynamic, thus collectivism and individualism can be found in different intensities in all societies. The point of this article is to recognize the essence of collectivism in the dining area, which is not exclusive to the Filipino society.
          What could be mentioned, however, is the fact that collectivistic societies do have one thing in common—everyone must start eating if and only if everyone is ready to do so.




Rudenstam, O. (2012, October 5). Individualism vs. collectivism. Retrieved May 1, 2015, from https://blogs.law.harvard.edu/orudenstam/2012/10/05/individualism-vs-collectivism/


-Myca Averion

No comments:

Post a Comment